Your email address:Powered by FeedBlitz
« Jonathan Wolff on Disadvantage |
| Brad Hooker on Consequentialism »
What is moral relativism? Should we just tolerate other ways of living? Can philosophers be experts in morality? Simon Blackburn addresses these and related questions in this audio-interview for Philosophy Bites.
Listen to Simon Blackburn on Moral Relativism
Posted at 01:14 PM in Blackburn | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516cc769e200e54ee6ca8b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Simon Blackburn on Moral Relativism:
Interesting but unconvincing. Blackburn acknowledges that moral relativism is wrong (i.e. that moral values exist objectively) but seems to have nothing more to say than that. What actually *are* those values?
Phil Craig |
December 28, 2007 at 08:56 PM
I have to say that subjectivism came out quite well here, when one adds the critical ingredient that morals are not individual, but communal. So the accurate position is that we are all subjectivists engaged in negotiations about how to control each other's behavior- a project of perpetual interest. Blackburn's position of quasi-realism, which partakes of no realism (or absolutism) whatsoever should really be termed negotiated subjectivism. It's main aim is to coordinate individual behavior so that it satisfies the individual as well as possible while not impinging too much on the sensibilities and behavior of others.
The role of religion in this view is to promulgate through force of hocus pocus a common (and often arbitrary) sensibility that makes the above coordination relatively efficient. But in our secular, enlightened time, a firmer ground is concepts like human rights and personal freedom, which everyone can get behind based on rather universal human feelings and the elementary logic of reciprocity.
Burk Braun |
February 06, 2009 at 06:52 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(URLs automatically linked.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites Back
David Edmonds: Would You Kill the Fat Man?
David Edmonds: Caste Wars: The Philosophy of Discrimination
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Rousseau's Dog: A Tale of Two Philosophers
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Bobby Fischer Goes to War
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Wittgenstein's Poker
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Basics
Nigel Warburton: A Little History of Philosophy
Nigel Warburton: Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction
Nigel Warburton: The Basics of Essay Writing
Nigel Warburton: Thinking from A to Z
Nigel Warburton: Erno Goldfinger: The Life of an Architect
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Essential Study Guide
Nigel Warburton: The Art Question
Nigel Warburton: Freedom: An Introduction with Readings
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Classics