Tip Jar

Thank you

Tip Jar

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Ethics Bites

Philosophy: The Classics

Ranking Link

  • Philosophy Blogs - Blog Top Sites

« Richard Norman on Humanism | Main | Richard Tuck on Free Riding »

February 03, 2008

Stephen Mulhall on Film as Philosophy

Can film be philosophy? Stephen Mulhall believes it can. Most philosophers who consider film focus on essential qualities of the cinematic medium, its reliance on photographic representation and montage, and so on. Mulhall has a very different approach. In this episode of Philosophy Bites he explains how the movie Bladerunner addresses philosophical themes.

Listen to Stephen Mulhall on Film as Philosophy

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516cc769e200e55011460e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Stephen Mulhall on Film as Philosophy:

Comments

Hi there -

Loved your episode on Film as Philosophy. I've long felt that Alfred Hitchcock was, perhaps, the best practitioner of this - that his films can be experienced as treatises on the meaning of filmmaking, "filmic reality" and so on. "Sabotage" (1936), for instance, explores the psychologically nihilistic implications of filmmaking, while "Rear Window" famously delved in to the subject of filmmaking as voyeurism. Nearly all of his films have similar psychological stuffing.

I've actually got a blog dedicated to just this subject. Feel free to drop by. In any event, I hope you explore this some more in future podcasts!

Cheers,

Joel Gunz
http://joelgunz-hitchcock.blogspot.com/

My mistake: I meant to refer to Hitch's films being replete with philosophical stuffing -- though there's plenty of psychology in them too!

Joel

Great interview and topic.

I'm particularly interested in why Bladerunner was concentrated on, and not any other examples of films, which would have given a wider scope to the application of "Film As Philosophy"?

Also what Stephen Mulhall describes as components and characters in a story which describe the medium of film surely allude as much to the story in the original book as much, if not more, than they do in the adapted screenplay for the film?

I'd be interested to hear more about whether this philosophy can be applied to films which never had a book preceding them: no prior story. Whether this particular line of thinking can include the CRAFT of film making. Examples of this might be the recent Stranger Than Fiction or Adaptation, both of which use scriptwriting and filmmaking as techniques alone to speak to the watching audience about the characteristic nature of cinema.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.