Pleasure is something we all seek. But should we? Is it the most important thing in life? Are all pleasures of equal value? Thomas Hurka investigates the concept of pleasure in this episode of Philosophy Bites.
« Amazon and Indirect Censorship | Main | Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on Moral Psychology »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516cc769e201156f32383d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thomas Hurka on Pleasure:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Another very interesting interview! I wanted to add that what makes the pleasure of e.g. eating chocolate, 'less desirable' are the serious downsides of substance dependence, diminishing return and addiction. The pleasure is conditional on the (finite) supply of chocolate.
General life satisfaction on the other hand, is not dependant on any finite commodity, and does not diminish over time. The pleasure in this regard is unconditional, (though it may demand a certain life-style). This lack of dependence makes it 'more desirable'.
I think types of pleasure do have a cost-benefit hierarchy, not based on intensity, but on the demand of their necessary conditions.
Posted by: Jim Vaughan | June 17, 2009 at 01:05 PM