David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton: Philosophy Bites
David Edmonds: Would You Kill the Fat Man?
David Edmonds: Caste Wars: The Philosophy of Discrimination
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Rousseau's Dog: A Tale of Two Philosophers
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Bobby Fischer Goes to War
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Wittgenstein's Poker
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Basics
Nigel Warburton: A Little History of Philosophy
Nigel Warburton: Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction
Nigel Warburton: The Basics of Essay Writing
Nigel Warburton: Thinking from A to Z
Nigel Warburton: Erno Goldfinger: The Life of an Architect
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Essential Study Guide
Nigel Warburton: The Art Question
Nigel Warburton: Freedom: An Introduction with Readings
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Classics
« The Moral Psychology of War |
| Ronald Dworkin Asks 'What Is A Good Life?' »
Brian Leiter makes a case for reducing the visibility of offensive cyber-cesspools, those websites, blogs, and chatrooms where demeaning and humiliating comments are posted. But would his solution work? Read more...
Brian Leiter kindly sent these comments:
A few comments on your short piece:
1. There is no reason why anyone should be tolerant of speech that is morally valueless.
2. There is an existing tort for knowing dissemination of otherwise tortious material, that it would be burdensome for Google to abide by an extension of the law to it is neither here nor there.
3. Google, YouTube and other Internet service providers already have legal obligations to remove material that violates copyright—but not material that is defamatory! It’s utterly bizarre: Americna law (and not only American) gives more protection to copyright than the dignity of persons.
4. My ‘solution’ to the Cyber-Cesspool problem actually has two parts, of which you mention only one: the other part is the repeal of Section 230, which insulates those who own blogs and websites from ordinary tort liability for hosting tortious amterial. (Again, there is an odd asymmetry: they aren’t insulated from copyright violation, just from hosting defamation!)
Nigel Warburton |
27/01/2011 at 08:25 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(URLs automatically linked.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address