Support Philosophy Bites

  • Donate in GB Pounds
  • Donate in Euros
  • Donate in US Dollars
  • Subscribe
    Payment Options

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

« Philosophy Bites: Links to the First 168 Interviews | Main | Michael Dummett (1925 - 2011) »

December 18, 2011


Ricardo Napoli

A very clear approach to the false distinction to the History of Philosophy. The idea that the distinction Analytic/Continental could be more sociological than really a Philosophical one sounds very plausible, than as Brian said it depends on the position assumed for the speaking philosopher in nominating the other so called tradition.
Bernard Williams and Frege are good examples to question that distinction.
Williams, on one side, has been educated in the analytic Philosophy, but had a very reach reception of Descartes, Nietzsche and some others known as "Continental" philosophers. Frege, on the other side, had a great influence on the establishment of the "analytic philosophy", but was born and educated in Germany. So, I tend really to accept Brian's idea that there is no sense to keep the distinction.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)